How to evaluate Xiaomi's upcoming 33W Gan charging head?

This is the product I thought Anker would launch.

After all, the smallest Gan charger was his family's product.

No, no, no, it's not the 20W charger that has been used all over Zhihu since last year. It's not a GaN charger. It's just that the size is properly controlled.

This is it:

This is actually very good. If it wasn't for switch's base mode, which requires more than 45W charging head, I think I already bought it.


Come back to Xiaomi. First of all, as a GaN charging head, its size and weight control is definitely better than that of ordinary charging heads. In short, the size of this 33W charging head should be close to that of the well-known 20W charging head, but the weight is still unknown. Should it be a little lighter? After all, the advantage of Gan is here.

Xiaomi priced it 79.

Well, I like it very much, although 33W power is not enough to start switch base mode.

It is not that Anker's charging head is not good, it needs technology to make the traditional charging head so small, really.


Just, the same size of Gan charging head can give you higher charging power, which is the rolling of technology, no solution.

The 20W charging headuse scene is actually embarrassing.

IPhone exclusive?

Basically, anyone who buys iPhone 12 will buy the 149 official charging head, right?

After all, the iPhone buyer is not bad for that money.

Few people will have two charging heads for the cell phone.

And it's not really great to charge Android phones with a maximum power of 20W.

So millet this similar volume of 33W Gan charging head, I like it!

But Anker, this should have been a product your family would have launched?

Your 30W Gan charger should be able to sell this size easily. Why don't you do it?

Because 20 W makes better?

Ha ha, ha ha.

Please clear the warehouse at discount!

What is Gan?

How to choose mobile phone charger? What recommended charging heads are available in 2021


Millet / purple rice 33W Gan charger: iPad with suffix series and 3a PPS device users' Gospel

IPad with suffix series: ipad Mini / iPad air / iPad Pro Series, PD fast charging is supported after 2019

Other 3A PPS devices: Samsung flagship, millet digital /redmi k system, black shark, red devil, one plus 8t

IPhone's 12 series uses this charger to achieve nearly 23W full load power

IPad can get more than 40% power than 20W PD, and 3a PPS is also a higher general protocol

Basic parameters of Xiaomi 33W Gan charger:

Weight: 50g

Third circumference: 30.4mm*30.4mm*34mm/49mm

Input: 100-240v-50/60hz 0.85a

Output: 3 groups of fixed PD - 9v/2a, 9v/3a, 12v/2.5a; PPS of 1 group - 5-11v/3a; One group of 33W private agreements for Xiaomi - 11v/3a; Additionally, qc4+/qc 3.0/qc 2.0/fcp/apple2.4a and other agreements are supported

Power density: 1.05w/cm ³ Mini charger with the highest power density at present

At the time of iPhone 12 release, many of the Anker 20W received and recommended by Zhihu V:

Weight: 30g

Third circumference: 27.2mm*27.2mm*31mm/46mm

Input: 200-240v~ 0.6A 50Hz

Output: two groups fixed PD - 5v/3a, 9v/2.22a; Support QC 3.0/qc 2.0/apple2.4a and other agreements

Power density: 0.91w/cm ³ The popular point compares the gap between the two:

Anker's core strengths are: charger size and weight

The charging power of millet can afford the volume increased by it relative to Anker

Anker can't get the iPhone 11/12 series to the highest power of nearly 23W

Anker iPad with suffix can only be used for up to 19W power, while those with small meters can be more than 40%

Anker does not support PPS, and the gap between mobile phones that support 3A PPS is more than 40%

Anker does not support Huawei FCP protocol or Qualcomm general qc4+ protocol

The pin is not foldable, which leads to a smaller storage volume difference between the two than the charger

Xiaomi 33W standard with a C2C cable (3a current) that can charge iPad

In fact, the biggest personal dissatisfaction with Anker is:

Less general protocol + insufficient PD power of iPhone, low applicability of multi device and multi platform

If you like Anker, it also meets the following conditions:

Only iPhone, it doesn't matter if you can't feed it. Just ask for small enough~

It is more recommended that you come to see dragon ice than Anker

Weight: 38g

Third circumference: 31mm * 31mm * 31mm

Input: 100-240v~ 0.6A 50Hz

Output: three groups fixed PD - 5v/3a, 9v/2.5a, 12v/1.8a; PPS in 2 groups - 3.3-7.5v/3a, 3.3-10v 2.25A; Additionally, qc4+/qc 3.0/qc 2.0/apple2.4a and other agreements are supported

Power density: 0.76w/cm ³ Core advantage: pin folding storage!

The pin can be folded first, which can reduce the actual storage volume of the charging head by a large amount

Second, the pin can be folded, which can reduce the scraping of other items during carrying

This product allows the iPhone 11/12 series to achieve nearly 23W full load charging power

To put it more, many people may have mistaken the positioning of the goods:

As the official accessory of millet, it is undeniable that it is not very cheap in Millet system, and certainly not expensive

But taking it as an iPad fast charging accessory will find that it is sincere in a 30W charger

Don't always compare 65W, and both are higher and heavier than 30 percent. Some people really just look like mini charging

As for me, why don't I like to blow smaller Anker?

Charging the iPhone with full power first, and then saying that it's a small size is an advantage. Is that the bottom line?